Tatianna Harris
April 14, 2025

Multi-Factor Authentication: Guarding Against Threats

People think proactive security practices are annoying, cumbersome, and even ineffective. But forensic watermarking and related security solutions like multi-factor authentication are effective tools for combating insider threats and securing sensitive information today's complex workplace environments. Rife with information ready to be leaked, businesses with private or classified information need to protect their assets from potential saboteurs.

Cyber threats no longer stem solely from anonymous hackers on the other side of the world. Increasingly, organizations must also confront the risk of insider-driven attacks—where a disgruntled or careless employee can exploit access privileges to cause extensive damage. One of the most effective ways to deter unauthorized access, whether from external intruders or insiders, is multi-factor authentication (MFA).

Yet not all MFA solutions are created equal. SMS-based verification, while arguably better than no protection at all, can be intercepted or used maliciously through SIM swaps or social engineering, potentially exposing organizations to catastrophic consequences. On the other hand, authenticator apps, passkeys, and other secure methods form a more robust defense against infiltration.

MFA implementation is of critical importance, and every organization—regardless of industry—should take immediate steps to protect itself from a potential extinction-level event. But there are caveats to different approaches… 

The True Cost of Neglecting Security

Failing to secure access to valuable information can trigger an avalanche of consequences:

  1. Reputational decline: Customers and partners lose confidence in an organization that cannot safeguard its own systems. This stain on a reputation can be difficult, if not impossible, to repair.

  2. Customer attrition: Once trust is broken, clients may sever ties and take their business to a competitor with a proven security track record.

  3. Fines: Different areas and jurisdictions impose penalties for lapses in security that expose consumer data or compromise critical infrastructure.

  4. Legal liability: Class-action lawsuits, breach-of-contract disputes, and investigations often follow high-profile leaked information or security breaches. Litigation consumes business resources that could have been better spent on preventive measures.

  5. Business closure: In the worst scenarios, mounting costs and an irreparably tarnished reputation can force an organization to fold entirely.

Why MFA is More than a Buzzword

Access control for a new era of threats

Multi-factor authentication ensures that even if an adversary obtains a username and password, they still need additional elements—ranging from a one-time code to a biometric scan—to gain entry. In an insider threat context, MFA helps ensure only those explicitly authorized to access sensitive data can do so.

Preventing credential abuse and lateral movement

Insiders have legitimate credentials, which may grant them higher level access than is necessary. When an employee’s credentials are compromised (or the employee goes rogue), MFA can stand in the way of unfettered access to critical systems. It forces the adversary—whether external or internal—to clear multiple security hurdles. These additions of security can be mandated by systems or organization-wide, helping investigative teams understand where an incident could have originated.

Vital for compliance

Many data protection and privacy frameworks either require or strongly recommend MFA. For example, financial services and healthcare providers must show that they are actively securing client and patient information.

Forms of MFA: Advantages and Caveats

Short Message Service (SMS)-Based Verification

  • Advantage: Ubiquitous and easy to set up; already familiar to most users.
  • Risk: Vulnerable to SIM-swapping and interception because SMS messages are written and sent in plain-text, and are unencrypted.
  • Best Use Case: Adequate for basic personal accounts, but insufficient for high-stakes corporate environments, or high importance personal accounts.

Authenticator Apps (e.g., Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator)

  • Advantage: Generate time-sensitive codes locally on a user’s mobile device, mitigating the risk for network based attacks/interception.
  • Risk: Compromised devices, loss of the phone without backups, or outdated versioning can pose security gaps.
  • Best Use Case: A more secure, commonly supported method to protect both personal and organizational accounts.

Passkeys (using Public-Key Cryptography)

  • Advantage: Often tied to biometric authentication (Face ID, fingerprint), removing the need for passwords altogether. Passkeys are highly resistant to phishing and other attacks because they are not locally stored or shared over a network connection, and eliminate the need for standard login credentials.
  • Risk: Limited to services that support passkey standards; device-centric (users must ensure they have backups or risk lockout).
  • Best Use Case: For safeguarding mission-critical assets where maximum security is paramount.

Encrypted Messaging Apps for Verification

  • Advantage: Messaging apps like Signal, WhatsApp, or Teams handle verification codes or secure links with end-to-end encryption, reducing interception risk.
  • Risk: Users must remain vigilant about phishing messages designed to trick them into revealing codes.
  • Best Use Case: Supplementary channel for high-assurance verification or communication of sensitive credentials.

Mitigating Insider Threats with MFA

Insiders—whether malicious or simply careless—pose a distinct challenge, as they already possess legitimate access. MFA helps reduce the risk of stolen credentials being freely used for lateral movement. Moreover, if an employee decides to act nefariously, robust authentication logs can track anomalies (e.g., unusual login times or access requests), allowing security teams to intervene quickly.

EchoMark’s proactive approach to insider threat deterrence and mitigation complements MFA by:

  • Ensuring employees have verified access to the data that was explicitly shared with them, and invisibly watermarking communications to prevent unwanted disclosure of information.
  • Providing real-time alerts to account admins when shared information has been viewed (like read receipts).
  • Logging access and views of shared files, based on the recipient.

In this way, while MFA locks down initial entry points, insider threat deterrence platforms like EchoMark cast a wider net to dissuade suspicious activities, while maintaining the necessary flow of information.

Next Steps: A Practical Checklist

  1. Prioritize MFA
    • Implement it for all critical accounts and systems, avoiding SMS if feasible.
    • Use authenticator apps or passkeys for an added layer of security.

  2. Evaluate Your Backup Strategy
    • Ensure you can recover authenticator app codes or passkeys in case of device loss.
    • Consider emergency codes or secondary verification methods.

  3. Adopt a Password Manager
    • Generate complex passwords automatically for accounts that still require them.
    • Protect access to the password manager with multi-factor authentication.

  4. Educate Your Workforce
    • Conduct training sessions on how (and why) to use MFA.
    • Explain the dangers of phishing, SIM swapping, and poor password hygiene.

  5. Strengthen Insider Threat Defenses
    • Deploy preventive solutions (like EchoMark) that deter, detect, and mitigate unauthorized disclosure of information.
    • Evaluate data access, and ensure it’s secured across the organization.

  6. Test and Update Regularly
    • Simulate breaches or phishing attempts to identify weaknesses.
    • Update your MFA methods and corporate security policies periodically, ensuring alignment with current best practices.

MFA is a fundamental layer of protection against unauthorized access and remains one of the simplest, most impactful ways to protect both individuals and enterprises. By combining authentication measures with ongoing employee education and insider threat intelligence, organizations can vastly reduce the likelihood of a breach from internal and external threat actors. It’s not enough to have an action plan after an event—a proactive, layered security strategy could mean the difference between an irreparable disaster and a recoverable incident.

EchoMark is ready to guide you through these critical decisions for information security,  bolstering your MFA practices with effective insider threat detection and deterrence. Security does not happen by accident; it happens through deliberate, proactive steps that ensure your business remains strong, reputable, and fully operational.


Resources

These reputable sources provide foundational guidelines, statistics, and best practices related to MFA and overall cybersecurity.

  1. NIST Special Publication 800-63B
  2. FIDO Alliance (FIDO2 and WebAuthn)
    • Why It’s Useful: The FIDO (Fast Identity Online) Alliance sets standards for passkeys, biometric authentication, and other “passwordless” methods. This is the group behind many passkey initiatives.
  3. CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency)
  4. Ponemon Institute – Cost of a Data Breach Report
    • 2024 IBM Security
    • 2025 DTEX
    • Why It’s Useful: Yearly, data-driven insights into how breaches occur, their financial impact, and how taking steps like implementing MFA can reduce potential business losses.
  5. Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)
    • 2024 DBIR
    • Why It’s Useful: One of the most widely cited annual studies on cyber threats, showing how compromised credentials contribute to data breaches.
  6. OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project)
    • Community MFA Cheat Sheet
    • Why It’s Useful: OWASP maintains detailed best practices, including a cheat sheet for implementing MFA securely in web applications.